|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Answers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlighted cells use formulas below from Gujarati
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Given the SRF, what is the first derivative with respect to inflation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because the regression is Y = B1 + B2X2 + B3X3, the first (partial) derivative with respect to X2 is simply B3 = -2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Our hypothesis is that the output growth parameter is six (6). What is the p value of the test?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First we need the calculated t (absolute value):
|
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
G6: calculated t stat (with three d.f.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The we can use TDIST():
|
|
|
|
|
12.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means, we can reject the null with only (1-12.4%) confidence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To understand this,…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note if confidence is 87% we (barely) reject null
|
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that if confidence is 88% we "accept" (fail to reject) null
|
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) Conduct a joint hypothesis test: are both partial slope coefficients statistically significant?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The F is given for us:
|
|
|
|
|
16.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But it is good to know:
|
|
|
|
|
16.73
|
|
|
G14: F stat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which exceeds the critical F, so we reject the null:
|
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or, the p value is
|
|
|
|
|
0.00245%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, we can reject with confidence of:
|
|
|
|
|
99.99755%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) What is the adjusted R^2 and why is it better than the unadjusted R^2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are given the adjusted R^2
|
|
|
|
|
0.538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But we NEED TO KNOW:
|
|
|
|
|
0.538
|
|
|
G20: Adjusted R^2, k = 3 because we have TWO partial slope coefficients Plus the intercept
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adjusted R^2 accounts for degrees of freedom (i.e., the additional explanatory variable)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
Output
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return
|
Growth
|
Inflation
|
|
Dynamic output
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY OUTPUT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
Y
|
X2
|
X3
|
|
X3
|
X2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1954
|
53
|
6.7
|
-0.4
|
|
Inflation
|
Output
|
|
|
Regression Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1955
|
31.2
|
2.1
|
0.4
|
|
(2.499)
|
3.943
|
3.532
|
|
Multiple R
|
0.7566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1956
|
3.7
|
1.8
|
2.9
|
|
1.082
|
1.293
|
8.111
|
|
R Square
|
0.5724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1957
|
-13.8
|
-0.4
|
3
|
|
0.572
|
14.202
|
- 0
|
|
Adjusted R Square
|
0.5382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1958
|
41.7
|
6
|
1.7
|
|
16.731
|
25.000
|
- 0
|
|
Standard Error
|
14.2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1959
|
10.5
|
2.1
|
1.5
|
|
6,749.451
|
5,042.582
|
- 0
|
|
Observations
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1960
|
-1.3
|
2.6
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1961
|
26.1
|
5.8
|
0.8
|
|
b3
|
b2
|
b1
|
|
ANOVA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1962
|
-10.5
|
4
|
1.8
|
|
se(b3)
|
se(b2)
|
se(b1)
|
|
|
df
|
SS
|
MS
|
F
|
Significance F
|
|
|
|
|
1963
|
21.2
|
5.3
|
1.6
|
|
R^2
|
se(y)
|
|
|
Regression
|
2
|
6749
|
3374.7253
|
16.7311
|
0.0000
|
|
|
|
|
1964
|
15.5
|
6
|
1
|
|
F
|
d.f.
|
|
|
Residual
|
25
|
5043
|
201.7033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1965
|
10.2
|
6
|
2.3
|
|
ESS
|
RSS
|
|
|
Total
|
27
|
11792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1966
|
-13.3
|
2.7
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1967
|
21.3
|
4.6
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coefficients
|
Standard Error
|
t Stat
|
P-value
|
Lower 95%
|
Upper 95%
|
Lower 95.0%
|
Upper 95.0%
|
|
1968
|
6.8
|
2.8
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercept
|
3.5318
|
8.1114
|
0.4354
|
0.6670
|
-13.1739
|
20.2375
|
-13.1739
|
20.2375
|
|
1969
|
-13.5
|
-0.2
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
X Variable 1
|
3.9433
|
1.2934
|
3.0487
|
0.0054
|
1.2794
|
6.6072
|
1.2794
|
6.6072
|
|
1970
|
-0.4
|
3.4
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
X Variable 2
|
-2.4994
|
1.0821
|
-2.3098
|
0.0294
|
-4.7281
|
-0.2708
|
-4.7281
|
-0.2708
|
|
1971
|
10.5
|
5.7
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1972
|
15.4
|
5.8
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973
|
-22.6
|
-0.6
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1974
|
-37.3
|
-1.2
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1975
|
31.2
|
5.4
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1976
|
19.1
|
5.5
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1977
|
-13.1
|
5
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1978
|
-1.3
|
2.8
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1979
|
8.6
|
-0.3
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1980
|
-22.2
|
2.6
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1981
|
-12.2
|
-1.9
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|